William Shakespeare s Hamlet, The Prince Of Denmark

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, The Prince of Denmark has remained to be the most astonishing of William Shakespeare’s tragedies. It is widely known to be considered as a philosophy or drama based play, but moral center is universally acknowledged. The characters in Hamlet persistently struggle with the power of their consciences, as they are tempted to satisfy their innermost desires. Hamlet, The Prince of Denmark, is bestowed upon the strenuous task of taking justice into his hands to avenge his father’s murder. Through this, complications of morality is put on display and is the overall moral center in Hamlet which is shown in his conflict of the soul between honour and conscience; emphasizing the moral controversy regarding revenge,†¦show more content†¦He is given an available chance to avenge his father’s murder, but he ultimately decides to not harm Claudius believing he was praying. Furthermore, he assumed that it would be unjust to kill him and send him to heaven without true vengeance. This describes his indecisive conscience. Moreover, Hamlet displays honour in his dealings with Ophelia. He tries to warn her away from him by appearing to her in a state of disarray and acting rather psychotic. This is evident when he speaks to her for the last time; â€Å"Get thee to a nunnery: why wouldst thou be a breeder of sinners? I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offences at my back than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. Venegas 2 What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all believe none of us. Go thy ways to a nunnery,† (3.1.131-139). Through this, morality is put on display and is the overall moral center in Hamlet which is shown in his conflict of the soul between honour and conscience. Hamlet’s questioning of life is a part of the moral center in Hamlet which promotes his virtue, perseverance, and ‘gentle human’ qualities. In Hamlet’s famous to be or not to be soliloquy, he is contemplating suicide. He compares death to a â€Å"little sleep,† (3.1.68), which

How Characteristics Of Culture Maintain Capitalist Society

The purpose of this paper is to examine how characteristics of culture maintain capitalist society. I will be using Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer’s The culture industry: enlightenment as mass deception, as the backbone of my analysis. This will be accomplished by assessing aspects of society such as: monopoly capitalism, the entertainment industry and relevance to modern day society. This paper argues that capitalism transformed culture into an ideological means of domination, and acts as brainwashing tool over the masses. Capitalism in The Concise Encyclopedia of Sociology is defined as: â€Å"the system that provides for needs and wants, animated by a particular ethos, coordinated and organized by establishing practices, regulations, and laws, privileging particular types of knowledge.† (Weber 1927, 47). Theodor Adomo and Max Horkheimer created a term known as â€Å"culture industry† which is the commercial commodification, and the mass-production of pseudo culture by corporations (1947, p.29). The creation of the culture industry resulted in the standardisation of the cultural form, which eliminated an individual’s ability to think critically. This occurred because of the greed that capitalism creates, the heads of production firms mass produce cultural goods that are aimed at people’s desires to increase profitability. They argued that capitalism abandoned its liberal roots and began to monopolize industries, thus creating monopoly capitalism. In society, the cultureShow MoreRelatedAlienation And Individualism : The Social Structures Through Industrialization And The Division Of Labour1567 Words   |  7 Pagesalienation and anomie signify how individualism has impacted the social structures through industrialization and the division of labour. Both Marx and Durkheim’s theories emphasize the relationships between people in society and how this impacts on separateness and individualism within it; however, both theories are different. Where Marx is concerned he focuses on being alienated as a result of materialized matter through the bourgeoisie alienating oneself from culture, for Durkheim anomie is due toRead MoreEvery sociological perspective has its limitations. However some are more useful than understanding society. Assess this view. (40 Marks)1087 Words   |  5 Pagestheories alongside several others, they are fundamental to the whole discipline of sociology. Functionalism is a structural theory they argue that society is made up of interrelated and interdependent institutions such as education, work, religion, law, the family etc. The main function of these institutions is to maintain social equilibrium. They see society similar to a human body with all the internal parts working together to bring out equilibrium. Functionalists see individual action as the productRead MoreAssess the Contribution of Marxism to Our Understanding of the Role of Education1676 Words   |  7 PagesThey see society as based on class divisions and capitalist exploitations. The capitalist society is a two class system as mentioned in Item A and it consists of a ruling class, the bourgeoisie and the working class, the proletariat. The bourgeoisie exploits the proletariat according to Marxists and they believe that the education system only serves the needs and interests of the ruling class, as mentioned in Item A. Marxists also education as functioning to prevent revolution and maintain capitalismRead MoreConsumption and Identity1704 Words   |  7 Pagesthey see these goods as a connection to their lifestyle. Many theorists suggest that consumption is correlated to the identity of an individual, that by purchasing goods from the mass market, it enables us to visibly establish our position within society. This differs from previous times in which a range of factors such as family histories, character and personal achievements played a significant role (Gabriel and Lang, 2006). Instead, there is the idea that the consumer has the ability to gain pleasureRead MoreUncertainty avoidance997 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿Uncertainty avoidance 1†¦.Uncertainty Avoidance, a society s tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity. It reflects the extent to which members of a society attempt to cope with anxiety by minimizing uncertainty. The  uncertainty avoidance  dimension expresses the degree to which a person in society feels uncomfortable with a sense of uncertainty and ambiguity. The fundamental issue here is how a society deals with the fact that the future can never be known: should we try to control the future orRead MoreOutline and assess the role of the police in the social construction of crime (50 marks)1735 Words   |  7 Pagesconstruction of crime (50 marks) Social construction refers to the way in which crime and deviance in society might be created and shaped by society and social institutions. This can occur in a number of different ways. For example, they can influence public perception and definitions of what establishes crime and deviance, deviants or non-deviants. They can also influence the amount of crime in society by amplifying it therefore clamping down on it. They can add pressure for changes in legislationRead MoreRelevance of Social Stratification1272 Words   |  6 PagesSocial stratification is defined as the division of a society into a number of hierarchically arranged strata. Strata are the levels or classes in society which are layered in a structured hierarchy with the least privileged at the bottom and most privileged at the top. (Giddens, 1977) A society, or human society, is a group of people related to each other through persistent relations, or a large social grouping sharing the same geographical or virtual territory, subject to the same political authorityRead MoreFunctionalism and Marxism. A Critical Evaluation Essay1135 Words   |  5 Pagesdisciplines. These social sciences attempted to explain the rapid and fundamental changes which were shattering traditional ways of life in Britain and Europe. Sociology emerged as one of these innovative areas and sought to analyse the nature of society and the complexities within it using collective theories and perspectives. The construction of a sociological perspective can best be illustrated by the application of several fundamental questions, the responses and explanations of which, produceRead MoreSocial Class Ladder As A Means Of Stratification Essay1451 Words   |  6 Pages Abstract In this essay I will answer the following questions to the best of my ability: 1. All societies use gender as a means of stratification. Discuss the consequences of this gender stratification, 2. Distinguish the difference between race and ethnicity, and give an example of each, 3. Summarize the U.S. social class ladder as proposed by Joseph Kahl and Dennis Gilbert, and 4. Discuss how marriage and family are viewed from the three sociological perspectives. FINALRead MoreLiberal Pluralism Vs. Modern Society Essay1628 Words   |  7 PagesPrior to engaging with the examples is is necessary to outline the characteristics of the two political economy paradigms. Liberal-Pluralism is relatively optimistic in its perspectives of capitalist society. Several different interest groups compose society, according to Liberal-pluralism (Louw, 14-15) and within that society, Media can be considered an agent of democracy because the relationship between media and audience is seen as even, in that, media requires large audiences to generate revenue

Battle Of The Ants And Shooting An Elephant Essay Example For Students

Battle Of The Ants And Shooting An Elephant Essay In both The Battle of the Ants by Thoreau and Shooting an Elephant by Orwell, imperialism plays a role. Both authors present, to some degree, their perspectives and feelings about imperialism. Orwell and Thoreau both present imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals and insects. The authors thus deliberate their introspection on imperialism by either being an imperialistic force or by taking part in imperialism. In The Battle of the Ants by Thoreau and Shooting an Elephant by Orwell, both authors use metaphors to represent their perspectives on imperialism. In Shooting an Elephant Orwell is taking part in imperialism by proving his power and dignity to the natives. In The Battle of the Ants Thoreau acts as the imperialist, or emperor, watching over a metaphorical battle between ants in which he never interferes or takes part in. Thoreau represents imperialism by comparing the black imperialist ants against the red republican ants. In shooting an elephant the elephant in symbolic of imperialism representing power as an untamed animal that has control over the village. In both stories the authors use animals to represent a significant metaphor for imperialism. Orwell uses a large and very powerful animal to represent imperialism, while Thoreau uses a small yet strong animal. This comparison leads to the understanding that the power behind imperialism is only as strong as its dominant rulers. In Shooting an Elephant Orwell represents the elephant as a force greater than the narrator has the ability to kill. It takes the narrator several shots to kill him, and a prolonged period of time for him to die. The elephants controlling force over the narrator is compared to that of an imperialist. Orwell is faced with a very important decision of whether or not he should shoot the elephant. If he does so, he will be a hero to his people. In turn, he would be giving in to the imperial force behind the elephant that he finds so unjust and evil. If the narrator lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the village. In The Battle of the Ants Thoreau never expresses his feelings on imperialism, but uses the ants to metaphorically show how imperialism is unfair. Thoreau describes the black ants as the imperialists who are larger and stronger compared to the red ants that represent the republicans. Thoreau describes the agonizing battle that is going on outside his door and watches as the black imperialist ants fight to a harrowing death, or victory, showing how neither side is willing to give up. Orwell and Thoreau both use animals to represent imperialism articulating the narrators views in which they are either taking part in imperialism, or taking on the part of an imperialist. In The Battle of the Ants Thoreau takes on the role of the imperialist while in Shooting an Elephant Orwell is taking part in imperialism. In Shooting an Elephant  the narrator feels forced by the natives to kill the elephant. The natives take on the role of imperialists as they stand in a big crowd behind him waiting for him to shoot the elephant. Imperialists use their people metaphorically as their little plastic fiqures they send out to fight. The Emporers and Queens have control over them but never take part in the actual fighting, like how the natives never took part in shooting of the elephant. The narrator speaks of how he is so against imperialism, but gives in to the natives by shooting the elephant to prove he is strong and to avoid humiliation. The natives only use the narrator to attain the elephants meat and tusks. The narrator became the crowds puppet being pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. Orwell 1837 In The Battle of the Ants Thoreau acts as an imperialist watching the ants do battle over each other. .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 , .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .postImageUrl , .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 , .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0:hover , .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0:visited , .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0:active { border:0!important; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0:active , .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0 .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u145e63948fbef344f647cdcf00701ca0:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Role in society EssayAs a narrator, Thoreau has a larger more powerful stance over the ants. At the end of the story Thoreaus thoughts on imperialism are those of experience. Thoreau says: I never learned which party was victorious, nor the cause of the war; but I felt for the rest of the day as if I had my feelings excited and harrowed by witnessing the struggle, the ferocity and carnage of human battle before my door. Thoreau 1747 Imperialists use their people for battle and have no remorse for them. As Thoreau watches over them fighting he realizes the struggle behind human battle and sees imperialism through the perspective of the ferocity that they endure. Thoreau als o comes to realize the extent of the Internecine struggles the imperialist and republicans have. Thoreau and Orwell both play distinctive roles in the parts of imperialism. In both perspectives each narrator gets a true feeling of imperialism and its divest affects among the people under imperialistic control. In both The Battle of the Ants and Shooting an Elephant the authors express their views on imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals and insects. The two different points of represented as either being an imperialistic force or by being an active part of imperialism.